STEPHEN PIDGEON

BIOGRAPHY

juris doctorate, is a recipient of the 2008 Presidential Commission, the 2008 Reagan Congressional Commission, a two-time recipient of the Congressional Medal of Distinction (2006, 2007), and a designee’ for the 2006 Businessman of the Year award. He has been named in Who’s Who, and Who’s Who in Business, is an ally of the Alliance Defense Fund, a friend of Advocates International, the Rule of Law Institute, the Individual Rights Foundation, the Human Action League, the Institute for Justice, the Federalist Society, the International Justice Society, the Christian Legal Society, the World Evangelical Alliance, and others promoting religious freedom, economic freedom, and civil society throughout the world.

Do not hesitate to make contact by e-mail to attorney@stephenpidgeon.com

FOR: Expert consultancy in international business, including SME development, tourism development, US export/import law, business creation and corporate organic law, international private law and transactions, and tax policy;

FOR: Consultation, Negotiation, and Policy Initiatives on Civil Society, Human Rights, Religious Freedom, Litigation Strategy, and Tactical Review;

FOR: Expert Testimony on issues of Civil Society, Human Rights, Religious Freedom, International Private Law, and International Public Law; and

FOR: Trial Advocacy, Arbitration, Mediation and Administrative Process Representation in Municipal, State, U.S. Federal and International Courts;

Forward

To a book

By

STEPHEN PIDGEON

I begin this discourse with a heavy heart, because ultimately, it is not appropriate to discuss the life of another human being with negative references to the sins of his past, particularly for the purpose of destroying his legacy before the general public. This book is needed, however, for the purposes of historical understanding - that those in future societies might make a review of the current times and more accurately assess those factors that resulted in the collapse of what a mere ten years earlier was the sole superpower on earth. The character of our subject here is most definitely a factor, and ultimately, the factor in the end of the constitutional republic of the United States of America. In the words of the immortal Yeshua HaMeshiach: “It is finished!”

Before proceeding further, then, it is necessary to address this human being known to us Barack Hussein Obama in peace (shalom) and in the spirit of the living God to call this fellow into the covenant. Let us consider a couple of things.

Obama has given a confession in Arabic that "there is no god but Allah." This declaration makes him a Muslim, whether he agrees with the theology or not. The Quran that Obama so dearly loves to quote says the following:

"We know best who deserve to be burnt in (the Fire). There is not one among you who will not reach it. Your lord has made this incumbent on Himself. We shall deliver those who took heed for themselves, and leave the evil-doers kneeling there." Al Quran 19:70-72.

All Muslims are judged in hell. This will include Mr. Obama, given his confession. The question he must ask himself is whether his good deeds outweigh his bad 7

deeds, because they will be weighed. He may seek to do an inventory now and compare in his own mind, because should the balance tip in favor of evil, he will be left kneeling in the fire.

Mohammed created a religion inspired by the words of Satan, as he readily admits in the Quran. The most notorious contradiction in the Quran is as follows:

[Sura an-Najrn (Star) 53:19-22]

[Now tell me about AI-Lat, AI-Uzza, and Manat, The third one, another goddess. What! For you the males and for him the females! That indeed is an unfair division.]

Al-uzza is another name for Ishtar (pronounced Eash’ter) (also known as Astarte, Ashterah or Ashtoreth, Isis, Diana, Artemis, Rus Khancy, etc. - a Babylonian fertility goddess). This admission was homage to the pantheon of pagan gods revered by Mohammed’s rivals in Mecca, which of course, was sufficient to entirely destroy the central premise of his theological claim - that there was no god other than the moon god his family worshipped, namely, Allah. This moon god was worshipped by the son of Nebuchadnezzar in ancient Babylon, but his name at that time was Sin.

When Mohammed realized that he had greatly erred, he claimed that the verses were given to him by Satan:

;"

["We have sent no messenger or apostle before you with whose recitations Satan did not tamper." Al Quran 22:52.]

This recitation is sufficient to disestablish the teachings of all the prophets which preceded him (that is, all of the writers of the Tanakh, and the New Testament prophets). It is this very verse which immunizes the Muslim from accepting the truth of the divinity of Yeshua, because all scripture "is tampered" and has been therefore altered by Satan, leaving the believer in these words subject to forces other than the Word - namely the sword of Jihad, wielded by the followers of Mohammed. Yet it was Mohammed who set out the words of Satan in his own discourse, denying the deity of Christ, denying the existence of the Holy Spirit, and denying the truth of the Holy Scriptures. It is no surprise that Mohammed, as expressed in the last Surah of the Quran, should "seek refuge" "from among the j inns (demons) and men."

This religion of Islam is the religion Obama seeks to bring to this country - a country he does not understand as a constitutional republic, but one he chooses to define in his own mind as a Caliphate (hopelessly overloaded with infidels) and one of the great Islamic countries of the world (his own confession) over which he rules as Caliph, notwithstanding those stupid infidel masses that "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them (like non-American Muslims) or anti-immigrant sentiment (including illegal immigrants) or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." These are Obama’s words, not mine.

Before we enter into this book, I am going to give my non-binding opinion, given what I have gleaned from the existing facts, and maybe we can sort out this thing a bit. The remainder of this book is primarily about the crimes of Obama, based on hard evidence. The fact that he took office without an objection from a single elector, a single Senator, or a single dissenting federal judge means that the constitutional republic of the United States died on January 21, 2009. All of those in government have no legitimate right to govern and are simply there because no one has prevented them from occupying their offices. They have no lawful right to these offices, because these offices were created by a constitution that no longer is of any force and effect. If they do not hold their office by means of the constitution, but what authority do they claim their office?

As for Obama, there is much to say. I do not believe Obama is his birth name. The birth certificate he recently released is a bald forgery; a ninth grader could have produced a more convincing document. The ten layers of add-ons over the Nordyke pro forma weren’t even covered up, as everyone who downloaded the form using Adobe illustrator was able to discover the layers. Obama is empowered when he lies and nothing is done to remove him from office. Like an evil demon in a science fiction movie, his power grows from his ability to lie without repercussion. The newly forged "birth certificate" is just another example.

What follows in this forward are my opinions, because obtaining the actual data is conveniently completely blocked by operation of law. Nonetheless, here are my VIews:

I don’t believe Obama was born in Hawaii, or for that matter, in Kenya. Obama was most likely born in Harborview Hospital in Seattle, Washington.

I don’t believe Obama was born on August 4, 1961, but was actually born around July 1, 1961, which I will explain as soon as we discuss his biological father.

I don’t believe the name on his original birth certificate was Barack, or Barry, or anything of the sort, as I believe this name was given to him a month later by his grandmother who was busy creating a new identity for him immediately following his birth.

Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, was the daughter of two members of the Communist party, and there is reason to believe that her father had betrayed the US during WWII by selling B-29 plans to the Germans. The family hated the US, but lived here for the prosperity of it all. Both parents were operatives, and Madelyn went on to become a fairly well-placed banking operative for the international banking cartel we now call the New World Order (NOW). Stanley Ann would follow in her mother’s footsteps in this regard.

As a teen, Stanley Ann was a progressive Marxist, who preferred men of color and men who were most certainly Muslim. I don’t believe she ever married Barack Hussein Obama - for that matter, I don’t believe they ever met, yet the family was able to secure divorce papers from a local magistrate in Hawaii, based on the sworn statement of Stanley Ann that there was in fact a marriage previously, and the signature of Barack Hussein Obama making no contest to the divorce (that included no child support and no visitation).

Stanley Ann was also promiscuous. She posed nude for some publisher of cheap pornography around 1959 (at the age of 16) and these photos have survived to this day. The photos are not relevant; the fact that she was willing to pose gives you some idea of her mindset at that time. When you marry her promiscuity to her love for Muslim men of color, and her true belief in communism, you have the fertile ground for belief in my next claim.

Stanley Ann’s parents left Mercer Island in April, 1960 to permanently move to Hawaii, but they left her behind to finish high school. She was expecting to enter collage at the University of Hawaii that fall, and classes began the first week in September. She didn’t arrive in Hawaii until September 26, 1960. Why?

For the communist movement in the United States, a very important event was set to occur in New York City, beginning on September 16, 1960 and continuing to September 26. Communist dictator Fidel Castro was going to appear at the United Nations and speak. This speech did occur, and it happened before JFK was elected, before JFK attempted the assassination of Castro and before the slaughter at the Bay of Pigs. Stanley Ann left Mercer Island and attended this event. Born on November 27, 1942, she was still 17 when she made this trip. She arrived in New York as a promiscuous, naIve, communist groupie, and a true believer in helping the cause.

Who, you might ask, coordinated this event in New York? It was none other than the leader of the Nation of Islam, a fellow whose birth name was Malcolm Little, but who had adopted the name Malcolm X, before accepting his Islamic name al Malik al Shabbazz. Malcolm X was already distanced from his wife at this point, who would go on to announce her longtime affair later in 1963. Fidelity to marriage was not an issue for either of them in 1960. Giving birth to a child, however, was a different problem altogether.

[Let us take a moment to consider this name Malik. Malik is a well-known Arabic name that means king. Why? Because it is derived from the well-known Hebrew term meaning king. The word is melek meh’lek - mem (M) lamed (L) chaf (K). The Hebrew letters mem, lamed and chaf are expressed in our alphabet as M, L, K. Don’t those letters sound familiar? One wonders if the parents of Dr. Martin Luther King knew of this Hebrew tadusha.

The name Malcolm is of a different origin. There is also a biblical origin for this name:

For Solomon ;-]'1i?1p went l?: after 10t\ Ashtoreth Iil/IIp~ the goddess t:I~;:i?~ of the Zidonians ~t7~¥, and after 10t\ Milcom t:I~7~ the abomination iPnp of the Ammonites 1;~~.1 Kings 11:5]

Now Milcom is somewhat similar to our name for king (MLK) but here appearing as MLKM (omitting discussion about final Kaf and final Mem), also expressed as Malcolm, and described as "the abomination of the Ammonites." Infants were sacrificed in the fire before Milcom. There is something in the name.

Under the laws of the state of Washington, if a mother is unmarried at the time of the birth, and there is no establishment of paternity or consent of the biological father, the mother may not place a name in the father slot of the birth certificate. This must remain blank, or make specification that the father is unknown. However, the mother may give the child any surname she so desires.

Because we still do not have an original birth certificate, we don’t know the choices made by Stanley Ann Dunham as she sat recovering from a relatively easy birth in the maternity ward of Harborview Hospital that morning in July in Seattle. We can, however, venture a guess.

If Stanley Ann made it to New York by September 16, 1960, in time to greet Fidel, it would still have taken several days before Malcolm X came to determine that she was "available." My guess is that the conception occurred on the weekend of September 23-24, 1960. If that was the case, then she would have given birth on July 1, 1961, not August 4, 1961.

For those of you seeking to research this issue further, here are the roadblocks we have met. First, all birth records in Washington are made available only as certificates. Second, only qualified individuals can obtain these birth records, which necessarily excludes those of us who lack "standing" (which is to say, we are mere citizens and tax-payers, not "important" people to the judges we elect and whose salaries we pay). Third, hospital records are protected by both state and federal privacy laws. Finally, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which was the paper of record in Seattle at that time, has shut down and is only available as a blog webzine.

Stanley Ann - who may not have yet spoken to Malcolm X about the baby, made a decision to name the child on the birth certificate. Did she name him after Malcolm? Maybe she did. Did she give him the father’s actual birth name of Little? I doubt it. More likely, she gave the child her family’s last name to keep congruity between her and the child. So a birth record for Malcolm Stanley Dunham, or something of that sort somewhere in the vital records of the state of Washington is likely.

Stanley Ann was seen on Mercer Island by eye witness Susan Blake at a time so close to the birth of the baby that she was still struggling to change diapers. Any parent can tell you that learning to change a diaper is about a 24 hour process. After the first dozen, you acquire the skill. This young mother did not return to Hawaii until January of 1963, only when she was certain that this fellow Barack Hussein Obama had left town.

What events followed? Stanley Ann, being unable to contain herself, contacted Malcolm X and told him he had a son. She also called her mother, and explained that the child would have Negroid (Hemetic) coloration. Malcolm X immediately ruled out ever coming to Seattle, where jurisdiction could attach, and began to make plans to "cover" the birth of this child. Madelyn began to take steps to cover the illegitimacy of the birth. Malcolm contacted his communist friend in Hawaii, Frank Marshall Davis, who was also a friend of the Dunhams via their mutual communist ties, and arrangements to redocument the birth were made.

Frank Marshall Davis contacted the Kenyan operative brought to Hawaii to study communist agitation in Kenya as paid for by the Ford Foundation, and offered a cash stipend should he agree to give documentation to this child born in Seattle. This operative is Barack Hussein Obama Onyango, and he apparently agreed - not only to allow his name to be used, but to take such further steps as may be necessary from time to time to cover this fraud, all for the sake of the worldwide communist revolution. All of this took roughly a month to accomplish, so the date of the birth had to be moved forward. Even then, they couldn’t get all the documentation together as planned, as so they ended up with two different dates: August 4, 1961 as the supposed date of birth, and August 8, 1961 as the supposed date of the announcements. The only thing on file in Hawaii is the affidavit of Madelyn Dunham attesting to the facts of this birth. There is nothing else. Adobe Illustrator did not exist in the 1960s, and neither did Obama’s BC.

Little Malcolm never knew his birth name. His grandmother took that name away from him and covered for the leader of the Nation of Islam. Did cash change hands? In the case of the Dunhams, it is doubtful, because they had a reason to engage in this cover-up: they sought a means to establish this baby as legitimate.

Obama Onyango almost certainly took money for the favor, maybe even more than once, given the divorce documents.

Notwithstanding the pleadings to the contrary, Stanley Ann was likely married for the first time to Lolo Soetoro, and Indonesian Muslim. She packed up the family and moved to troubled Indonesia, where she gave birth to a daughter, and where Obama was adopted by his step-father along at the same time as his other step-sister Lia (now deceased). Something happened during this time in Indonesia that caused Stanley Ann to drop her son like a hot potato back in the lap of the woman who changed his name, Obama’s grandmother Madelyn. This decision was made shortly after the separation between her and Lolo, but Stanley Ann continued to work in Muslim Indonesia, and then in Muslim Pakistan for Peter Geithner and NWO. Barry was given over to his grandmother to rear without further ado. Madelyn insisted on the tax write-off for Obama as a dependent, because Anna wasn’t taking it anyway, living in Indonesia.

The knowledge of Barry’s actual lineage, however, was not lost on the far left. There were people in Chicago who knew he was the son of X - the son of royalty in the minds of the Komsomol - an heir by blood to the hard left leadership of the communist revolution in the US.

Something again happened that caused his mother to spend time with her son. He was suddenly useful with his Muslim name and his Muslim heritage, and his Indonesian passport, and in 1981, this loose cannon of pop culture slop began to move through a metamorphosis to emerge as Barack Hussein Obama. Did he try another name first? There is a document that appears above where someone named Barak Mounir Ubayd made a name change to Barack Hussein Obama in British Columbia in 1982.

.

The document shows a registration of the name change candidate in British Columbia in 1973, around the time Barry was 12. Did the Dunham family seek a backdoor to change Barry’s name from Barry Soetoro to a name of Barry’s choosing? Who knows? At any rate, the name Barack Hussein Obama appears to be legally obtained under Canadian law by a fellow who presented himself as Barak Mounir Ubayd. To make matters worse, Obama was also adopted by the Crow Tribe of the Apsaalooke Nation in Montana, and was given the Crow name Awe Koota Bilxpaak Kooxshiiwiash. This may be the most lawful name he has.

In Obama we have a curious mix. His mother was trained by the Jesuits, yet she spent her whole life in Islamic countries. She tried to train Obama in Jesuit schools, but he elected to follow Islam. He still does:

In Obama’s book Audacity (the one he actually wrote) he said "In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans ... have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging," he laments. "I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

He still on occasion pays homage to his mother’s direction, showing up in a Black Liberation Theology church for "Easter," one of two times he has attended a so labeled Christian church since taking office. He pretends he is Christian, while he lives the life of a Muslim.

Let us then return to the names of his birth: MLKM, not MLK. One is an abomination (or as Jerome Corsi would say, an Obamanation), the other a king. Obama wrestles with the two identities, neither of which includes the views of a fundamentalist Christian, pro-constitutional republic, American.

So, before I document the crimes of this fellow since he has entered the public eye, allow me to direct this discourse to Barry himself.

Salvation remains an option for you even now, notwithstanding the demands of those who surround you. You have prayed at the Kotel for the protection over your wife and family, yet your actions bring a curse for seven generations. Your claim to Islam will find you kneeling in hell, where the Muslim god of your choice will weigh your decisions to bomb civilians in Pakistan by means of unmanned drones, to kill the son of Qaddafi when his nation had not lifted a finger against us in decades, your promotion of infanticide through not only funding late term abortions in our country and other nations, but including your willingness to insist that babies who survived abortions should be left to die, against your good deeds, which are? You will not escape the tortures of the lake of fire by means of your own confession.

Your friends will ridicule my statements to you here, but I will say them anyway. It is still possible to confess He who shed his blood for your sins - all of your sins, which you know are many and egregious. It is possible for you to be made perfect in the sight of Y’hovah through the blood of the risen one, Yeshua HaMeshiach. You may reject this, but let it not be said that the option wasn’t placed before you. Believe on Yeshua, his sacrifice and atonement, the propitiation for your sins, and be saved. Renounce your other gods, and confess the true 1 am.